On 12/12/06, naitsirhc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This seems to be working quite well, and stays generic enough to use > for any M2M non-symmetrical field for a given model. Any thoughts, > comments, criticisms?
Obviously, it would be nice to be able to support this sort of thing without having to resort to custom SQL and custom managers, but with Django as-is, this looks like a reasonable enough solution to the problem. There was some recent talk about adding aggregate clauses to the Django query language. With richer aggregates, 'orphan finding' (amongst many other things) would be much easier; however, discussion didn't get much further than the proposal phase. Yours, Russ Magee %-) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
