well, actually my design goal is not to bloat it up to zope/plone
proportions :)
i actually like the django approach a lot, i like to call it
application driven instead of content driven sites.

you want something dynamic under /news, you write an app. i dont really
want to create a cms that lets a user create content types and put them
wherever he wants, a least not now. if that is needed you can just use
zope/plone. I just want to include a framework where it is easy for the
user to do "some stuff", like versioning and workflow for apps and
flatpages, and building/organizing menus/breadcrumbs, uploading files
and linking easily to objects from other apps (a object register), and
all this without getting in the django developers way.

i registered at dynamite cms and will c what is going on there, but I
have the feeling the want to do it the plone way (content objects
instead of apps)

On Jan 14, 1:42 am, "spacedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ashwoods wrote:
> a simple open and free CMS would be good for a lot of people, specially
> the newcomers. the problem is how to design a CMS that doesn't limit
> the freedom you learn to love when you choose to use django over some
> cms. Someone looks like they tried to start a project like this, there's
something on the google code site:

http://code.google.com/p/dynamite-cms/

 and one thread I started when I stumbled upon it:

http://groups.google.com/group/dynamite-developers/topics?lnk=li

 but there's no actual code yet...

 A nice TTW-editable CMS in Django would indeed be quite fine, but I do
fear it bloating up to Zope/Plone proportions. But hopefully it could
still be kept manageable...

Barry


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django 
users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to