Hi, I believe the the binary package is suitable for development and I plan integrating docker in my company's upcoming project, so I needed a package best for production.
Thanks kasper On Mon, 31 Oct 2022, 19:51 'Kasper Laudrup' via Django users, < [email protected]> wrote: > On 31/10/2022 19.32, Adeyemi Deji wrote: > > > > Hello, fam! > > > > Found a solution to the problem. Updated the Dockerfile. Check below > > > > Great to hear you figured it out and thanks for sharing. Out of > curiosity, any reason why you chose to build the psycopg2 package from > source instead of using a prebuilt binary? > > I would assume using the prebuilt binary would have been simpler and of > course make it much faster to build your container than building your > own package from source. > > Thanks and kind regards, > Kasper Laudrup > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Django users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-users/fa5906c5-929f-a2b8-91e2-72d8b0fb8194%40stacktrace.dk > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-users/CAEO1GrqUD-TWOKre3DjLmeZMP%2BZxxP%3DK%2B9%3DdBBjrPi9PmQt5Ow%40mail.gmail.com.
