On Mar 30, 1:08 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm confused. First you said it took 0.2 seconds, then you say it took > 47 seconds and then 3 seconds. Both of those numbers are bigger than > 0.2. I know this because I took advanced maths courses at university. >
Yea, I tried to clear that up in the previous post. .2 seconds was on the dev server, not apache2/mod_python, little data and without the optimization. 47 and 3 was before and after the optimization on the production env: apache2/mod_python and production data (19 presentations). > Even so, around three seconds for 19 iterations of that loop without the > form seems a bit slow. That's only just over five per second (since it's > really 3.8 seconds). We may need to look at newforms performance when > things have settled down a bit. Not worth being too premature in the > optimisation, but this is an interesting data point. Also as a side note, this is Django 4455. I'll be happy to try to write up some tests or something. I should get familiar with tests sooner than later anyway. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
