On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 10:31 +0200, David Larlet wrote: > 2007/5/24, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > The unicode branch, [1], is now at a point where it is essentially > > feature-complete and could do with a bit of heavy testing from the wider > > community. > > Thank you so much for this branch! > > > Similarly, the slugify filter still behaves as it did before. At some > > point it will be extended to handle a _few_ more non-ASCII characters, > > but it's never going to be a full transliteration function. They are the > > two big items I expect people would otherwise try to extend beyond what > > is intended. There may be others and I'm sure we'll discover what they > > are as the questions pop up. > > Why don't we use the slughifi function: > http://amisphere.com/contrib/python-django/ ? > I already use it to replace the django one and it's very useful (at > least for french titles).
If the author wanted to contribute that under a new-BSD license, we could use something like that, certainly (at least as the Python replacement; the Javascript enhancement should probably be smaller so that we don't have to ship so much data around, but that's a minor issue). There's been a lot of work put into that table of mappings, which is the bit we can really use. If you are the author, or you know the author and think they want to submit it for inclusion, please open a ticket in Trac. We really only need the table of mappings. Regards, Malcolm --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
