Henrik Lied escribió: > This is great, Chris, but the fact of the matter is that it won't > appeal to the "Wordpress crowd". > That group wants in-browser setup, easy plugin architecture etc. > contrib.admin wouldn't do the trick. The admin-panel would have to be > hand made. > > For the plugin architecture: I have no idea how we'd do this well. Any > input here? > It *could* be done in a Facebook Apps-manner (the actual code is > remotely hosted, the admin-panel would show a list of available > plugins), but I don't know how ideal this would be in a real world > scenario. It sure would be great, though! > > > On Jul 25, 12:06 am, "Chris Moffitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I think I mentioned earlier in this thread, that I do have my take on >> creating a blog here >> -http://www.satchmoproject.com/trac/browser/satchmoproject.com/satchmo... >> >> It's pretty full featured right now and makes use of the tagging and >> comment_utils libraries. It still needs the feeds but that should be pretty >> simple. It's BSD licensed so hopefully it will be useful to folks. >> >> -Chris >> > > > > > What about the symphony way of plugins? You have a page in the admin with the latest plugins available (rss?) and you just click one and the app downloads and istalls it.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
