Linux is linux after all. The kernel remains largely the same, unless you get a patchy distro.
The choice is all about your knowledge. If you know your way around in linux, it doesn't really matters. If you're a bit *newer*, you might want to go with a distro with strong repos and a good package manager. I wouldn't even consider using Windows as a server OS. Sorry for the flames. El mar, 18-09-2007 a las 08:02 -0500, Tim Chase escribi�: > > Any special reasons debian based installs are better than > > fedora based ones? > > I can't say there should be any sort of major difference once > meta-package programs were instituted for dependency tracking. > My understanding is that Yum may do this sort of thing. > > I tried Red Hat early in the game and grew frustrated with the > "yes, RPMs install easily, but you have to track down each > dependency individually and install it first" nature of it. > However, that was 5-10 years ago (around RH v5 through v8)...I've > just never tried an RPM-based distro since then. If I wanted > dependency-tracking headaches, I'd build everything from source :) > > As long as you can tell your distro "install these things I care > about and install any requisite dependencies you might need to in > order to get there", it doesn't really matter. > > -tim > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
