If you're going to use YUI, I'd check out Ojay (http:// ojay.othermedia.org/). Raw YUI is very verbose; Ojay is a convenience layer on top of it.
-Ken On Apr 29, 12:09 pm, ydjango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, Going ahead with YUI. > > Reasons for choosing yui > 1) Free and from Yahoo. Well supported. > 2) Grids > 3) Datatable > > Surprising, how very few frameworks support data tables and how hard > is to do data table. I would have expected this to be something out of > box for all frameworks. > Even Mainframes have it and had it for decades. > > Ashish > > On Apr 22, 6:23 am, desfrenes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Don't miss JQuery ! > > > On Apr 21, 8:33 pm, Rajesh Dhawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Apr 21, 2:13 pm,ydjango<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Django is a pretty good framework for server side web development. > > > > > client side Web development is also very time consuming and painful. > > > > > For Web Client side development, are there any good web ui frameworks > > > > which can make developing look and feel and ui of a web site as easy > > > > and as productive as Django does for server side. > > > > > Any client side frameworks Django developers have used to ease that > > > > pain and save time? > > > > Recommendations will be appreciated. > > > > In no particular order: > > > > ExtJS > > > YUI > > > Prototype > > > Dojo > > > .... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
