I'm currently running 2 personal sites on a 256MB slice at Slicehost and each one takes about 30MB with one dedicated mod_wsgi daemon process (and perhaps a couple of MBs more for servicing static files through Apache and the database connection). So depending on the size of your application, a 256MB slice should definitely give you at least a good starting ground :-)
-- Horst On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am about to begin a new Django project and I am currently evaluating > hosting options. I know there has been a number of discussions on this > topic, and I have read most of them. However, seeing how quickly > things change in the web development / hosting world, I wanted to get > some opinions if the following summary still holds true. > > The most useful information I have found on Django hosting was here: > http://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2008/jan/12/mt/ > > From this, and other sources, I believe the best hosting options to > be: > > 1. Web Faction - for those that want to get Django up and running as > quickly and easily as possible, using their automated setup. > > OR > > 2. Slicehost - for those that want COMPLETE control of their hosting > environment. Only drawback (for some) is that everything needs to be > installed from scratch. > > In the case of Slicehost, I am also curious if the 256 slice is > sufficient for most Django apps. > > I appreciate any thoughts or comments. > > Thanks! > > Jeff > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
