Or Samba, too. I suggested sshfs because the OP said "over SSH". Also, it takes *no* set-up on the server--just have ssh running. Not that NFS is hard to set up, of course--just requires some actual work. And who wants to do that?
On Jan 30, 11:29 am, Alex Robbins <alexander.j.robb...@gmail.com> wrote: > It might be even easier to just set up an NFS mount of the other > machines. It would be a lot like Jeff's idea, but NFS is pretty tried > and true. (I don't know anything about SSHFS, it might be really good > too.) > > On Jan 30, 9:54 am, Jeff FW <jeff...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Instead of trying to get Django to do something like that, have you > > looked into using sshfs? That would make it essentially transparent-- > > all Django would know is that it's saving a file to a filesystem. > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SSHFS > > > On Jan 29, 9:05 am, Andrew Ingram <a...@andrewingram.net> wrote: > > > > On Jan 29, 1:19 pm, Christian Joergensen <m...@razor.dk> wrote: > > > > > What if one of the machines was unresponsive at the time of the upload? > > > > One option would be to have all the files uploaded locally, but the > > > handler would additionally copy to the other locations. The other > > > would just to be to have some exception handling. File uploads aren't > > > a site user task for us, so short periods of broken upload > > > capabilities are tolerable. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
