an ideea:
build a custom Model Form for Character, and after that define CharacterHome
Model Form.
class CharacterForm(forms.ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = Character
exclude = ('some', 'fields','here', 'that', 'you', 'do', 'not',
'want', 'to', 'display' )
class CharacterHomeForm(forms.ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = CharacterHome
exclude = ('character',)
If you want to display them, you just use
obj = CharacterHome.objects.get() # whatever you get your object
chform = CharacterHome(instance=obj)
cform = Character(instance= obj.character)
the rest, should be fun.
Alecs
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:14 PM, goobee <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Léon,
> it's not that basic. Picking up your example, I define a Form based on
> CharacterHome. Then I show 1 entry from CharacterHome; the field
> 'character' is shown as a MultipleChoiceField where ALL entries from
> Character are listed. But I need only the one particular record that
> ist referenced by the selected CharacterHome.
> In addition the user should only get non-editable fields on the html-
> page
>
> regards
> goobee
>
> On 24 Aug., 12:11, Léon Dignòn <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Basically you have to link them with a foreign key. I hope this fits
> > your needs with the legacy table.
> >
> > class Character(models.Model):
> > guid = models.IntegerField(primary_key=True)
> > name = models.CharField()
> > …
> > class CharacterHome(models.Model):
> > character = models.ForeignKey(Character, primary_key=True)
> > …
> >
> > If you want an instance of character returning the guid, define a
> > __unicode__() function
> >
> > def __unicode__(self):
> > return self.guid
> >
> > -ld
> >
> > On Aug 22, 9:36 pm, Ryan Bales <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I have experienced this same issue, and that link didn't really help.
> > > I am trying to hook into a legacy database using "inspectdb", and I
> > > can't index the tables.
> >
> > > class Character(models.Model):
> > > guid = models.IntegerField(primary_key=True)
> > > name = models.CharField()
> > > ...
> > > ...
> > > class CharacterHome(models.Model):
> > > character = models.IntegerField(primary_key=True)
> > > ...
> > > ...
> >
> > > Even though django accurately assesses the datatypes of these tables,
> > > I want to be able to set CharacterHome.character as a ForeignKey
> > > (Character) and have Character return the "guid" integer value.
> >
> > > On Aug 22, 5:29 am, Léon Dignòn <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/forms/modelforms/#using-a...
> >
> > > > Good luck!
> >
> > > > -ld
> >
> > > > On Aug 21, 3:49 pm, goobee <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > hi there
> >
> > > > > I'm in dire need of a good idea. django drives me crazy with its
> > > > > foreignkey-resolver.
> >
> > > > > class person(models.Model):
> > > > > name ...
> > > > > firstname ....
> > > > > ....
> > > > > ....
> >
> > > > > class participant(models.Model):
> > > > > group ......
> > > > > person(foreignkey(person))
> > > > > funk ...
> >
> > > > > I want to show 'participant' using the ModelForm-feature. From
> model
> > > > > 'person' I need name and firstname only (or __unicode__) of the
> > > > > particular participant, but django delivers the entire table
> 'person'
> > > > > which is an unnecessary overkill (especially with several FKs in
> > > > > 'participant'). There must be an option to avoid this behaviour!?
> >
> > > > > thanks for any ideas- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > - Show quoted text -
> >
>
--
As programmers create bigger & better idiot proof programs, so the universe
creates bigger & better idiots!
I am on web: http://www.alecslupu.ro/
I am on twitter: http://twitter.com/alecslupu
I am on linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alecslupu
Tel: (+4)0748.543.798
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---