On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Todd Lyons wrote: > 1) Is the split process logic sound? I saw one post in the archive > reference a verify process, but that's all.
Yes, it's a sound approach. It's recommended when you don't have a border MTA dedicated to DKIM operation. > 2) Is the milter "order of operations" logic accurate? If no, then #1 > is probably moot as well. Yes, you have that right as well. > Note: if this is part of the purpose of the milter macro > _FFR_ANTICIPATE_SENDMAIL_MUNGE, then it makes a lot of sense. But I've > not seen anything that says it's more than a workaround for sendmail > 8.13.x header management. Also correct; that FFR just preprocesses headers by removing characters the MTA will remove itself later, so that the signed message and what the verifier will see match up. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
