On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Mike Markley wrote: > Given the detail above, SM's patch + umask seems like it should do the > trick nicely. (From a purely selfish perspective: I'm not building with > _FFR_QUERY_CACHE, so even if that isn't forced to 0600, it's not a > problem here.)
0600 would be appropriate anyway; there's no legitimate reason for any other process to gain access to that cache. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
