Scott Kitterman skrev, on 19-08-2007 21:51: [...]
> What I'd do in your position is figure out which library is doing the TXT > substring concantenation and see if it gets it wrong. That would be my bet. Good catch, though it wasn't the concatenation. Why didn't I look at the dkim-filter log? 2.1.1 is now giving much better output that earlier versions. All of the messages Mark sent yesterday (Postfix log) failed with: SSL error:04077068:rsa routines:RSA_verify:bad signature. dkim-filter (libdkim) has been built with openssl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5 (Red Hat), all Mark's signatures are signed a=rsa-sha1. But then, so are yours (from earlier) and yours are passing. Maybe someone could comment on that? --Tonni -- Tony Earnshaw Email: tonni at hetnet dot nl ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
