On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Mark Martinec wrote: > Thanks! I applied the patch, but it doesn't seem to help with the > 0.msg. Did you try it on my test case? (I'm using FreeBSD 6.2, > dkim-milter-2.1.1 from ports with the patch #1777332 applied).
No, but the patch fixes a signing problem when relaxed body canonicalization is used, meaning the signature in 0.msg may not be valid in the first place. The signer would have to apply the patch as well. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
