Murray S. Kucherawy skrev, on 21-08-2007 07:52:

>> I'd prefer a 2.1.2 soon so that it can find its way into FreeBSD ports, 
>> but I don't mind waiting few days until the other issue is resolved.
> 
> I'll do a release Wednesday afternoon then since I'll be away for a few 
> days after that.
> 
> Tony, have you made any progress?

Not really. The thing I can't figure out, is that Marks' (and others') 
messages are failing verification on my RHL5 "work" site, yet not on my 
FC6 "test/home" site - even though I'm building all rpms/srpms on my 
test site and rebuilding exactly the same srpm configuration/build on 
the work site.

When received messages fail validation, they're all failing with "SSL 
error:04077068:rsa routines:RSA_verify:bad signature". Both sites are 
running openssl 0.9.8b.

Moreover, reflectors' replies always fail verification on messages we 
sign and send for validation (our messages always validate), but if we 
send an unsigned message to a reflector, the signed reply from the 
reflector validates.

Quite another thing: can someone explain how I go about validating the 
signature of someone else's message, for example Mark's 
http://www.ijs.si/~mark/tmp/1.msg.gz?

Best,

--Tonni

-- 
Tony Earnshaw
Email: tonni at hetnet dot nl

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
dkim-milter-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss

Reply via email to