On Sat, 15 Sep 2007, sid milter wrote: >> You can run two MTAs, one that does the masquerading, then pass the >> message to the second MTA which does the DKIM signing. > > Is it the only solution available?
Currently, yes. > Are there any way to edit sendmail.cf, Yes, turn off masquerading. The issue is that the data which get signed and the data which get sent are not congruent. Clearly though that is in conflict with your needs. > to patch sendmail milters, As in patch libmilter? The problem is not in milter's scope, so no. You'd have to patch (actually, rework a large part of) the MTA. > or to patch dkim-milter ? As I stated, I have such a patch available for dkim-milter but I'm not really done with it yet. Thus, it's experimental only, but I can make it available if you want it. > We use the sendmai.cf including, > > FEATURE(masquerade_envelope)dnl > FEATURE(allmasquerade)dnl > MASQUERADE_AS(hoge.com)dnll > MASQUERADE_EXCEPTION(`ml.hoge.com')dnl > FEATURE(`always_add_domain')dnl > > Can I use your patch for these features ? I have to re-read what always_add_domain does as my patch may not cover that case, but it does cover the others. I'll post it someplace in the next few days. -MSK ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
