What if the bodies are signed with "simple", will the canonicalization tolerate the change?
Thanks. On 10/15/07, Murray S. Kucherawy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Janet N wrote: > > Does converting bare CR and LF characters to CRLF characters will > > invalidate the dkim signature verification? > > > > I noticed my ironport server that accepts relay messages from my > > sendmail is converting bare CR and LF to CRLF. > > Probably. Message bodies signed with "relaxed" canonicalization will > tolerate changes to spacing but not to CR->CRLF and LF->CRLF conversions > because that messes with where the engine thinks lines end. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > dkim-milter-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
