Hi,

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04.01.2008
21:47:52:

> On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Is the hash (DKIM header) which is shown in the Mailheader of an
> > outgoing mail created from the whole message (header _and_ body)? It is

> > not clear enough for me, because the header is changing on its way to
> > the receipient. On the other hand, it must be the whole message,
because
> > of the "relaxed" (changes allowed via transfer) and "simple" (changes
> > not allowed via transfer) flags?
>
> The process is described in detail in section 5 of RFC4871, but I can
> summarize it for you.
>
> Two hashes are generated when signing.  One is the hash of the body,
which
> is eventually stored in the signature header as the value of the "bh"
tag.
> Then the headers to be signed are assembled and canonicalized, including
> the DKIM-Signature: header you want to add but without the value of "p="
> (the actual signature).  Those headers are then hashed, and that hash is
> signed using the private key.  The signature thus generated is added as
> the "p=" value to the header just before it is sent.
>
> In this way, if you have a number of copies of a message to send and want

> to change the To: header (for example), you only need to compute the body

> hash once, and you just recompute the header hash and signature for each
> message.
>
> > The other question, is there another mailinglist just about DKIM
> > (because my question is just DKIM relevant).
>
> I don't know of a list for general DKIM Q&A, and one isn't shown at
> www.dkim.org either.  You can ask your question here if you like.

thanks a lot for your summarize. Now i got it.

Axel


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
dkim-milter-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss

Reply via email to