On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: > * the couple (hostname,msgid) is, IMHO, an easy way to share a not fixed > secret. I don't agree with SM, as this IS couple is a unique ID. > > If the message ID is inside a comment, it's good enough for me, as it > allows me to ensure better checks, and allows current behaviour of > removing old AR. But OK, do what you think it's the best way...
I'm fine with either the comment method or prepending the job ID (plus a delimiter like "/") to the authserv-id so that the existing header removal code will still work. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
