At 12:13 29-03-2008, Andy Fiddaman wrote: >This got me thinking. I understand that the filter failed to find a valid >author signature in the message due to a bug, but given that my DKIM key >has the testing flag on it, should the message really have been >flagged with permerror?
The Authentication-Results (A-R) draft does not suggest anything different for that condition. We can always flag with permerror and add a comment for the testing flag. >I could read that to mean that the DKIM verifier shouldn't flag the >message in any way even if it fails validation due to ASP. It means that the message should be treated as unsigned. If we use "none" in the A-R header for the above case, we won't see the actual results of the verification. The alternative is to pass the verification results as a comment. Previously, we had the error with (testing) after it. Regards, -sm ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
