On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Jukka Salmi wrote: >> Make the attached patch to libmilter, rebuild your library and then >> relink dkim-filter, and let 'er rip. > > done. I'm already seeing lots of "milter returned bogus status m in > state n" lines. Is this expected behaviour?
Can you send me a few samples? Then I'll be able to tell you if they're expected or not. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
