On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Andy Fiddaman wrote: > Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:33:26 +0000 (GMT) > From: Andy Fiddaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: dkim-milter general discussion > <[email protected]> > To: dkim-milter general discussion <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Solaris 10, dkim 2.5.3 dies quickly > > ; On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > ; > You won't get a core if you're using UserID, since some OSes now refuse to > ; > dump cores if setuid() is called. Is that the case here? > > This will sort that: > > # coreadm -e proc-setid > > I use the DKIM library on Solaris 10 but not the filter. > The gdb backtrace shows the binary has been compiled as 32-bit if that > helps.
Yes, right. I don't do anything fancy in the compile, so even though it is 64 bit hardware, most/all of my stuff runs in 32 bit mode. I see Murray's patch further down in my emails, will test drive it this morning. Stay tuned. Jeff Earickson Colby College ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
