At 08:07 29-04-2008, Karl Boyken wrote: >As a solution to the problem of sendmail munging headers after the >DKIM signature has been calculated, the dkim-milter README suggests >routing mail between one port, where all the munging occurs, and >another port, where dkim-milter runs. I use DaemonPortOptions and >am clear about that aspect, but I'm scratching my head over the >routing bit. I suspect I'd need to either create a LOCAL_RULE_0 or >use virtusertable somehow, but I'm not sure about specifics yet, and >it seems to me there'd be a danger of creating a loop if I botched >it. If anyone has some suggestions or examples, or could outline >potential pitfalls, I'd be grateful. Thanks.
You can have the second sendmail process acting as a smarthost. The first sendmail process can route the mail there using: define(`SMART_HOST',`[192.0.2.1]')dnl where 192.0.2.1 is the IP address the second process listens on. There's no loop unless you have the second sendmail process sending mail to the first one. virtusertable is not applicable for such a setup. Regards, -sm ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
