On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Karl Boyken wrote: ; As a solution to the problem of sendmail munging headers after the DKIM ; signature has been calculated, the dkim-milter README suggests routing mail ; between one port, where all the munging occurs, and another port, where ; dkim-milter runs. I use DaemonPortOptions and am clear about that aspect, but ; I'm scratching my head over the routing bit. I suspect I'd need to either ; create a LOCAL_RULE_0 or use virtusertable somehow, but I'm not sure about ; specifics yet, and it seems to me there'd be a danger of creating a loop if I ; botched it. If anyone has some suggestions or examples, or could outline ; potential pitfalls, I'd be grateful. Thanks.
I may have read too much into your mention of DaemonPortOptions in my last post so I'll summarise the options: You can run two different instances of Sendmail, using two diferent configuration files, as suggested by SM. The only gotcha to be aware of here is to ensure that they use different banner so that they don't think there is a loop. If you only want to run one instance with two virtual daemon ports, then you need a ruleset based solution such as the one I posted. This might be appropriate when you're using a packaged Sendmail environment which makes running multiple daemons troublesome - such as with commercial Sendmail Switch. HTH. A. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
