Hi Murray, Thanks for your quick response -- and the patch. The patch works great. I recognized the mistake as the copy-and-paste-forget-to-change-something variety that I've made in my own code at times.
> You could accomplish (2) by running one instance that signs and one that > verifies. I thought of this as a possible solution as well, though I'm not sure how to implement it in Sendmail. Clearly, setting up two dkim-filter processes on different ports with two different configuration files is trivial. Although I'm learning sendmail, I'm by no means an expert. It seems like I'll need a custom set of mail rules to handle the various cases and to invoke one dkim-milter or the other, right? I can see the following scenarios: 1. Verify: Incoming mail from non-lotspeich.org addresses. 2. Verify: Incoming mail from lotspeich.org addresses: Since the running sendmail is the MTA & MDA on my server, it seems like we have to splice into the mail handling in Sendmail. The MTA will sign the mail and the MDA should verify, it seems. I'm really not clear on how this would work or how to configure it. 3. Sign: Outgoing mail destined for non-lotspeich.org addresses; this mail could be sent from lotspeich.org itself via the MSA or via the MTA (Sendmail daemon) using SMTP Auth. 4. Sign: Outgoing mail destined for lotspeich.org addresses originating from lotspeich.org addresses; this mail could originate from the MSA or via the MTA (Sendmail daemon) using SMTP Auth. Thanks again for your help. Regards, Erik. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
