Hi Ben,
At 10:25 15-07-2008, Ben Lentz wrote:
>I have a dumb question: I was going through the dkim-stats on one of my
>MTAs and noticed that messages from my own domain had quite a number of
>failures. After tracking the problem down to a handful of specific
>message ids in my logs, I noticed that bounce messages from=<> and also
>showing up as [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Authentication-Results
>header for dkim-milter.

What's in the From: header for these bounce messages?

>The result is that any remote system that sends us bounce messages sends
>(without a domain? <>) ends up being processed against the local domain
>instead of not being processed at all. Naturally, the message isn't
>signed, and the verification fails.

I'm not seeing that over here.  My dkim-stat output looks fine.

>Seems weird. Maybe something is wrong with my config, and it's entirely
>possible it has nothing to do with dkim-milter at all... Thanks in advance.

Is any header rewriting being done or is the address being canonified 
by your MTA?

Regards,
-sm 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
dkim-milter-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss

Reply via email to