On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Robert Schetterer wrote: > would something like this be a valid > adsp dns entry ? > [...] > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > _adsp._domainkey.schetterer.org. 37181 IN TXT "dkim=unknown"
Yup, looks perfect. > i am not really sure about the syntax > > http://www.sendmail.org/dkim/wizard > > tells to use > _asp._domainkey.schetterer.de. IN TXT "dkim=unknown" > for adsp That wizard still uses "_asp" instead of "_adsp" (the spec only changed recently), otherwise the output is right. > which i ve done too,but > asp seems to be an old or other name for adsp True, but some verifiers might still be using the old name. Depending on how important it is (i.e. if you're using "all" or "discardable") you might want to post the record at both. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
