Tomasz Chmielewski schrieb:
> SM schrieb:
>> At 11:18 13-02-2009, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>>> Probably what's inserted in an email would be interesting as well:
>>>
>>> X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.1 mydomain.tld CCF1F980FC
>>> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;
>>> d=mydomain.tld; s=mydomain.tld; t=1234549656;
>>> bh=4pDpXBY8rCbX8+MfrklZzpQxaUsa3vSPUYjcDR3KAnU=;
>>> h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:
>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding;
>>> b=AbxD...
>>> r...
>>> c...k=
>> What DKIM selector are you using?
>
> default
It seems to work if I make the following DNS entry (as I'm getting
DKIM_SIGNED=0.001,
DKIM_VERIFIED=-0.001):
mydomain.tld._domainkey.mydomain.tld. IN TXT "v=DKIM1; g=*; k=rsa; p=MIG..."
# dkim-testkey -d mydomain.tld -s mydomain.tld
# dkim-testkey -d mydomain.tld -s default
# dkim-testkey -d mydomain.tld -s blah
dkim-testkey: No key
And this is beacuse I use "KeyList" in dkim-filter.conf:
## users. The selector used will be the filename portion of "keypath".
## Blank lines are ignored, and the hash ("#") character is interpreted
## as the beginning of a comment. See dkim-filter.conf(5) for more
## information.
So I guess, with these settings, everything is fine now?
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
dkim-milter-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
