Thanks for the response.  As for you squib at the end of your note, hope this 
helps, if belatedly:


Rob MacGregor wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 19:01, Dave CROCKER <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Please reply to Murray's survey, indicating the features you rely on now.  
>> Feel
>> free also to indicate the ones you do not expect to ever use.
...
> Part of the problem of lack of reponse may be that the DKIM site
> doesn't lend itself to easily finding information.  I don't really
> want to wade through hundreds of lines of RFC to understand what the
> header options are ;)



 From the RFC 4871 table of contents:


3.5 The DKIM-Signature Header Field

     <http://dkim.org/specs/rfc4871-dkimbase.html#dkim-sig-hdr>

     These are the tags inside the DKIM-Signature: header field


3.6 Key Management and Representation

     <http://dkim.org/specs/rfc4871-dkimbase.html#keys>

     These are the parameters in the DNS TXT record for a DKIM key


d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
dkim-milter-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss

Reply via email to