On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 13:16 -0700, Mike Markley wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 09:10:11AM -0700, SM <[email protected]> wrote: > > Please explain what you are trying to do. > > Based on the posts from dkim-ops, it seems that he's looking to use the > envelope sender as the signing identity. That doesn't seem problematic, > although what receivers will do with such a signature is questionable. > > I am also curious, though, about the reason the OP wants to do this... >
I am trying to domain keys sign mails relayed by our server for our customers mails. This is a newsletter and the From: Header is not our control. I can however control the envelope from and can use dkim signatures for the mail. I was looking at the code of dkim-milter and was able to "patch" it to use the envfrom to extract user & domain instead of Sender: of From: What I want to know ... is it a standard practice to do sign using any domain. What are restrictions. There would be a lot of reasons for dkim-signing using envfrom. For eg this mailing list could sign its mails using signatures of lists.sourceforge.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
