I have tested using outlook express from a windows server in my deve
environment, using mail on the dkim test box, and using alpine
my DNS records show up on brandoncheckett test as such
Message contains this DKIM Signature:
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dkimtest.reyrey.net;
s=default; t=1301417449;
bh=g3zLYH4xKxcPrHOD18z9YfpQcnk/GaJedfustWU5uGs=;
h=To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:From;
b=vHrFZQTBl1DOSfvcx0ir5VORt7PRRPL/InG6+Dsq7YXmr6RESygt3NBstPIZawxVW
3CuBZpjCbMSYzyvl0eeJmfNb2kLhDTzx1UWFjI6V8easXqm5UnQNN6WS8ConZFHlQL
UVVkFPjh420mSp3Lw+X81plpKEta3R5KbjKhJq2E=
Signature Information:
v= Version: 1
a= Algorithm: rsa-sha256
c= Method: relaxed/relaxed
d= Domain: dkimtest.reyrey.net
s= Selector: default
q= Protocol:
bh= g3zLYH4xKxcPrHOD18z9YfpQcnk/GaJedfustWU5uGs=
h= Signed Headers: To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:From
b= Data:
vHrFZQTBl1DOSfvcx0ir5VORt7PRRPL/InG6+Dsq7YXmr6RESygt3NBstPIZawxVW
3CuBZpjCbMSYzyvl0eeJmfNb2kLhDTzx1UWFjI6V8easXqm5UnQNN6WS8ConZFHlQL
UVVkFPjh420mSp3Lw+X81plpKEta3R5KbjKhJq2E=
Public Key DNS Lookup
Building DNS Query for *default._domainkey.dkimtest.reyrey.net*
Retrieved this publickey from DNS: v=DKIM1; g=*; k=rsa;
p=MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDERR/0XNoaE7dWr0zvsJCGqMFUGEw4Rlez1u6QZUfNV2YdlxDhNYrB3iibSjvrUnonNZvZDp7dHx943WPuPhXbAbo035nKsn/tDJIRpGPbKZ4LTIe7WEC5LtYYyChMB0fLdqCGwkkI4HF3ofdK+kyAUk/J25CoftFxBH+XhAyKPQIDAQAB
Validating Signature
result = fail
Details: message has been altered
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Todd Lyons <[email protected]> wrote:
> Back onlist...
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:46 AM, brandon murphy
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I am using dkim-milter.
> > even using open-dkim it brings up these errors.
>
> Ok, that's good to know. Which testing services are you using? Can
> you give us a domain and selector so that we may verify that your DNS
> is configured properly? If we can't see your dns text records, then
> neither can the systems which are doing verification.
>
> > I have sendmail preloaded on the server, I stop that service to use
> postfix.
> > my apologies for the confusion with that. postfix loaded is straight out
> the
> > box postfix. no masquerading is being used to my knowledge.
>
> Ok, so you're using postfix to do this. I know that recently I've
> seen cases where someone had to force postfix to only process a
> message through milters once, but I do not recall the exact scenario.
> I suggest viewing the opendkim mailing list archives to see if you can
> spot anything postfix related that might make sense to you.
>
> --
> Regards... Todd
> "It is the nature of the human species to reject what is true but
> unpleasant and to embrace what is obviously false but comforting."
> "You might be a skeptic if you have pedantically argued the topic of
> pedantry."
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the
growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses
are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software
be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker
today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar
_______________________________________________
dkim-milter-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
