At Mon, 17 Aug 2009 04:55:14 +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote: > > At 16 Aug 2009 19:15:56 -0000, > John Levine wrote: > > > > >However, some end-users may misunderstand my ADSP policy on > > >"dkim=all" because my signature already gone away into space by > > >removing. What can i do for solving this point? Should i switch to > > >"dkim=discardable"? Or is this good practice without any faults? > > > > > >Any advice comment welcome! > > > > The best thing for you to do is to remove your ADSP record, since ADSP > > cannot say anything correct and useful about your mail. (You could > > publish dkim=unknown, but that's no different from publishing > > nothing.) > > > > ADSP is only useful to a very, very small group of senders, who never > > send mail to mailing lists or other remailers, and whose domains are > > frequently forged. These domains probably include Paypal and large > > banks, but do not include ISPs, universities, or other domains with > > individual users. > > After a while think, i switched to "dkim=unknown". Thanks! >
After thinking again, i settled down at "dkim=all". Thanks to all helped me by commenting. Finally thanks to IETF. Sincerely, -- Byung-Hee HWANG ∑ WWW: http://izb.knu.ac.kr/~bh/ _______________________________________________ dkim-ops mailing list [email protected] http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-ops
