> that leads me to suspect that maybe Yahoo is really officially >carrying BellSouth customers' email.
Yes, Yahoo handles much if not all of the mail for AT&T's ISP subsidiaries. >DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; >s=s1024; t=1251295577; >bh=AWurPyCfrWyL7Q4VoVf/3EwEKj++xepXQ72Z/H6SNU0=; >h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; >b=NtTZuqgd... > >The problem is that bellsouth.net has no selector named s1024. However, >yahoo.com does: Right. It's a bug at Yahoo's end. But it's also a bug at your end, since the DKIM spec is quite clear that a signature that can't be verified is equivalent to no signature. Your fix was the correct one, turn off the buggy code that rejects mail on a DKIM DNS lookup failure. R's, John _______________________________________________ dkim-ops mailing list [email protected] http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-ops
