On Jun 23, 2010, at 10:12 AM, Jim Fenton wrote: > I finished my study of key length usage; it's posted at > http://blogs.cisco.com/security/comments/key_lengths_for_dkim_signatures/#more > > Just to come up with an objective measure (since I know I can't define "high > risk"), I weighted the results both by number of domains and number of > successfully signed messages from each domain. The results aren't radically > different, but Facebook is far from being alone in using 512-bit keys.
Nicely done! I expect most folks just use whatever default key length their software generates. That's what I did, and I might've been expected to know better. -- J.D. Falk <[email protected]> Return Path Inc _______________________________________________ dkim-ops mailing list [email protected] http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-ops
