Adam Megacz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Personally, I would advocate John's approach, combined with support > > > for the <unicode> element from the XMC draft: > > > Thanks for the offer. I went ahead and just changed the code to throw > > an XmlRpcException (it's really annoying that that is a checked > > exception, btw, grrr). > > Why not just send it as <unicode>, then? That would eliminate the > checked exception.
I don't know what XMC is, and don't have the time or inclination to learn about it. -- Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
