"Chris Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It appears that the XmlRpcClientLite doesn't properly handle Authentication. > I can switch my client code between XmlRpcClient and XmlRpcClientLite and > when I use Lite, Authentication always fails. I briefly looked at the > source and it appears the Lite version at least pays attention to > authentication, but the result doesn't work. Anyone else seeing this? I > was hoping to use the Lite client for faster/better performance combined > with setKeepAlive. > > I saw one or two old emails in the archives, but no answers on this same > topic. Any commentary?
Chris, I don't know the specifics, but Andrew and Ryan are working on refactoring the whole Client* goat rodeo to make things a little more friendly to use. If you can sit tight for a bit, you'll soon have a crack at their work. -- Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>