"Andrew Evers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > This issues that you've brought up so far are now taken care of. > > Please let us know what other tweaks would make the library more > > easily embeddable -- this is an important use case for most of us. > > Also, if you plan on adopting CVS HEAD, let me know and I will slap > > another tag on the repository. > > On the subject of tagging things, I would like to commit the transport > independence changes I've been working on to the client code somewhere, > in order to keep the ball rolling. I would prefer to commit them to > HEAD if possible, but I'm willing to put them on an CLIENT_NG branch > or similar. > > Most of the work is in making it easier to work with the client without > having to use Vectors and Strings, and to separate the XML-RPC and HTTP > layers on the client side as much as possible. > > The code is now quite well tested, as it is integrated into our system > here, so, it really needs to be reviewed for acceptance more than > tested (although extra testing is always good).
If you think it's ready for CVS HEAD, +1 on commit then review. Otherwise, let's put it in a branch. In any case, I'm looking forward to seeing it in CVS. -- Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
