Ryan Hoegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Mind if I modify this to use a private log() method that behaves
> identically? This is just looking forward to standardization of the
> library on a logging platform.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > try
> > {
> > Socket socket = serverSocket.accept();
> > + try
> > + {
> > + socket.setTcpNoDelay(true);
> > + }
> > + catch (SocketException socketOptEx)
> > + {
> > + System.err.println(socketOptEx);
> > + }
> > +
> > if (allowConnection(socket))
> > {
> > Runner runner = getRunner();
Ryan, I've been wanting more elegant handling logging since I started
working with the package. Rather than make a little tweak here and a
little tweak there, I think it's time for a more whole-sale approach.
What's the minimum number of class we'd have to include to make use of
Jakarta Commons Logging?
--
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
