Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Bob DeAnna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > What is the reason for not suporting the returning of a void in xml-rpc > > methods? > > Is that dictated by the xml-rpc spec? > > Yes.
There is an extension type, Nil, which is explicitly not supported by XML-RPC. What you can do instead is return a marker value known to represent void, or simply have your handler return true and ignore the return value entirely. -- Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
