"Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >on 2002/12/8 2:37 PM, "Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> What about Avalon logging? It's better suited for server-side logging, > >> and has its own abstractions that make it possible to use as > >> implementations log4j, logkit or whatever. > > >I prefer that we use commons-logging. > > >I'm -1 on Avalon logging as the dependency simply because I like to have the > >choice as to which logging package I want to use. > > I agree on this. commons-logging is a "commons" package. I'd prefer to > use as little from other projects (where we have no influence and > vote) as possible.
Indeed, I'm more likely to use Log4J than LogKit or the JDK 1.4 Logging API, but I would rather leave it up to the Turbine users to decide for themselves -- thus, Commons Logging is the perfect fit. -- Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
