Martin Poeschl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> 
> > We didn't fork. Any commons project should work with all projects to
> > find a common solution that all would switch to. This hasn't been
> > done, and is happening now with configuration. We have a
> > Configuration system, and commons configuration is still going its
> > way. We'll see if it comes out similarly to logging.
> 
> 
> i just started to look at the avalon stuff ... but i think it would be
> good to have things like logging and configuration in commons ...
> 
> commons-configuration needs a XMLConfiguration implementation
> ... avalon has one .. why don't we join forces??

What about the one in Stratum? 

jakarta-turbine-stratum/src/java/org/apache/stratum/configuration/XmlConfiguration.java

Stratum's configuration stuff was just copied from Commons
Configuration when Jason wanted to do some refactoring, so it would be
simple to merge back into Commons Configuration.  Looking at what
Avalon has to offer is a good idea regardless.
-- 

Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to