Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> In preparation for checking whether the architecture has data cache
> aliasing within alloc_dax(), modify the error handling of virtio
> virtio_fs_setup_dax() to treat alloc_dax() -EOPNOTSUPP failure as
> non-fatal.
> 
> For the transition, consider that alloc_dax() returning NULL is the
> same as returning -EOPNOTSUPP.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
> Fixes: d92576f1167c ("dax: does not work correctly with virtual aliasing 
> caches")
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
> Cc: Alasdair Kergon <[email protected]>
> Cc: Mike Snitzer <[email protected]>
> Cc: Mikulas Patocka <[email protected]>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
> Cc: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
> Cc: Vishal Verma <[email protected]>
> Cc: Dave Jiang <[email protected]>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> ---
>  fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 15 +++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> index 5f1be1da92ce..621b1bca2d55 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>  #include <linux/fs_context.h>
>  #include <linux/fs_parser.h>
>  #include <linux/highmem.h>
> +#include <linux/cleanup.h>
>  #include <linux/uio.h>
>  #include "fuse_i.h"
>  
> @@ -795,8 +796,11 @@ static void virtio_fs_cleanup_dax(void *data)
>       put_dax(dax_dev);
>  }
>  
> +DEFINE_FREE(cleanup_dax, struct dax_dev *, if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(_T)) 
> virtio_fs_cleanup_dax(_T))

This IS_ERR_OR_NULL is ok because dax_dev is initialized to NULL, but
maybe this could just be IS_ERR() and then initialize @dax_dev to
ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP)?

Reply via email to