Mike,
On Tue, 2024-03-19 at 12:53 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
> While I appreciate you making us aware of this crash, I'm really not
> interested in going down the rabbit hole of reasoning through fairly
> complex concerns unless you have gotten your customer a kernel with
> latest fixes (e.g. commit b4459b11e840) and they _still_ crash.
>
> Has that happened?
Not yet; I wanted to bring up the issue upstream first. But what you're
saying makes sense. We will ask the customer to test with a kernel that
has b4459b11e840 added.
> NOTE: There is also 85067747cf98 ("dm: do not use waitqueue for
> request-based DM") but you probably have it since you said other than
> missing the changes from commit b4459b11e840 that your dm-rq.c was
> same.
This commit was already contained in the kernel that the customer had.
Thanks,
Martin
