When one stacking device is over one device with virt_boundary_mask and
another one with max segment size, the stacking device have both limits
set. This way is allowed before d690cb8ae14b ("block: add an API to
atomically update queue limits").Relax the limit so that we won't break such kind of stacking setting. Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218687 Reported-by: [email protected] Fixes: d690cb8ae14b ("block: add an API to atomically update queue limits") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/ZfGl8HzUpiOxCLm3@fedora/ Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Cc: Mike Snitzer <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: Song Liu <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]> --- block/blk-settings.c | 16 ++++++---------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c index cdbaef159c4b..d2731843f2fc 100644 --- a/block/blk-settings.c +++ b/block/blk-settings.c @@ -182,17 +182,13 @@ static int blk_validate_limits(struct queue_limits *lim) return -EINVAL; /* - * Devices that require a virtual boundary do not support scatter/gather - * I/O natively, but instead require a descriptor list entry for each - * page (which might not be identical to the Linux PAGE_SIZE). Because - * of that they are not limited by our notion of "segment size". + * Stacking device may have both virtual boundary and max segment + * size limit, so allow this setting now, and long-term the two + * might need to move out of stacking limits since we have immutable + * bvec and lower layer bio splitting is supposed to handle the two + * correctly. */ - if (lim->virt_boundary_mask) { - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(lim->max_segment_size && - lim->max_segment_size != UINT_MAX)) - return -EINVAL; - lim->max_segment_size = UINT_MAX; - } else { + if (!lim->virt_boundary_mask) { /* * The maximum segment size has an odd historic 64k default that * drivers probably should override. Just like the I/O size we -- 2.41.0
