On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 09:30:17AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 12:47:14AM +0800, Kuan-Wei Chiu wrote:
> 
> > -struct min_heap {
> > -   void *data;
> > -   int nr;
> > -   int size;
> > -};
> > +#define MIN_HEAP_PREALLOCATED(_type, _name, _nr)   \
> > +struct _name {     \
> > +   int nr; \
> > +   int size;       \
> > +   _type *data;    \
> > +   _type preallocated[_nr];        \
> > +}
> 
> 
> > @@ -3738,7 +3739,7 @@ static noinline int visit_groups_merge(struct 
> > perf_event_context *ctx,
> >     struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = NULL;
> >     /* Space for per CPU and/or any CPU event iterators. */
> >     struct perf_event *itrs[2];
> > -   struct min_heap event_heap;
> > +   struct perf_event_min_heap event_heap;
> >     struct perf_event **evt;
> >     int ret;
> >  
> > @@ -3747,11 +3748,9 @@ static noinline int visit_groups_merge(struct 
> > perf_event_context *ctx,
> >  
> >     if (!ctx->task) {
> >             cpuctx = this_cpu_ptr(&perf_cpu_context);
> > -           event_heap = (struct min_heap){
> > -                   .data = cpuctx->heap,
> > -                   .nr = 0,
> > -                   .size = cpuctx->heap_size,
> > -           };
> > +           event_heap.data = cpuctx->heap;
> > +           event_heap.nr = 0;
> > +           event_heap.size = cpuctx->heap_size;
> >  
> >             lockdep_assert_held(&cpuctx->ctx.lock);
> >  
> > @@ -3760,11 +3759,9 @@ static noinline int visit_groups_merge(struct 
> > perf_event_context *ctx,
> >                     css = &cpuctx->cgrp->css;
> >  #endif
> >     } else {
> > -           event_heap = (struct min_heap){
> > -                   .data = itrs,
> > -                   .nr = 0,
> > -                   .size = ARRAY_SIZE(itrs),
> > -           };
> > +           event_heap.data = itrs;
> > +           event_heap.nr = 0;
> > +           event_heap.size = ARRAY_SIZE(itrs);
> >             /* Events not within a CPU context may be on any CPU. */
> >             __heap_add(&event_heap, perf_event_groups_first(groups, -1, 
> > pmu, NULL));
> >     }
> 
> Not too happy about these. If you ever add more fields they will go
> uninitialized. Why not keep the existing form and fix the struct name?

Sorry for the late reply. I'm traveling.
I'll change that back in v4.

Regards,
Kuan-Wei

Reply via email to