On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 10:29:13PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 03:26:06PM -0400, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: > > Does this mean that if a dm device was made up of two linear targets, > > one of which mapped an entire zoned device, and one of which mapped a > > single zone of another zoned device, the max active zone limit of the > > entire dm device would be 1? That seems wrong. > > In this particular case it is a bit supoptimal as the limit could be > 2, but as soon as you add more than a single zone of the second > device anything more would be wrong.
Actually even for this case it's the only valid one, sorry.
