On Mon, 2025-03-24 at 16:55 -0400, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: > There is nothing for update_uninitialized_path() to do for paths in > the > INIT_MISSING_UDEV state. In fact, there shouldn't be any paths in > this > state when update_uninitialized_path() is called, since they will > have > switched to a different state in check_uninitialized_path(). > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarz...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Wilck <mwi...@suse.com> > --- > multipathd/main.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/multipathd/main.c b/multipathd/main.c > index ecad5a4f..9c44e6e6 100644 > --- a/multipathd/main.c > +++ b/multipathd/main.c > @@ -2889,7 +2889,6 @@ update_uninitialized_path(struct vectors * > vecs, struct path * pp) > struct config *conf; > > if (pp->initialized != INIT_NEW && pp->initialized != > INIT_FAILED && > - pp->initialized != INIT_MISSING_UDEV && > pp->initialized != INIT_OFFLINE) > return CHECK_PATH_SKIPPED; >
