On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 04:46:03PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote: > So, today I implement a version, and I do admit this way is much > simpler, turns out total 200 less code lines.
That's what I thought :) > And can you check the > following untested code if you agree with the implementation? I'll > start to work a new version if you agree. >From a very quick look this looks great.
