On 6/25/25 2:33 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h
index 3d1577f07c1c..930daff207df 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h
@@ -350,11 +350,11 @@ enum req_op {
/* Close a zone */
REQ_OP_ZONE_CLOSE = (__force blk_opf_t)11,
/* Transition a zone to full */
- REQ_OP_ZONE_FINISH = (__force blk_opf_t)12,
+ REQ_OP_ZONE_FINISH = (__force blk_opf_t)13,
/* reset a zone write pointer */
- REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET = (__force blk_opf_t)13,
+ REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET = (__force blk_opf_t)15,
/* reset all the zone present on the device */
- REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET_ALL = (__force blk_opf_t)15,
+ REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET_ALL = (__force blk_opf_t)17,
/* Driver private requests */
REQ_OP_DRV_IN = (__force blk_opf_t)34,
Since we are renumbering operation types, how about also
renumbering REQ_OP_ZONE_OPEN and/or REQ_OP_ZONE_CLOSE? Neither operation
modifies data on the storage medium nor any write pointers so these
operations shouldn't be considered as write operations, isn't it?
Thanks,
Bart.